School of Public Policy, Georgia Tech
Technology Policy Market
Publications

Journal Articles

Brown, Marilyn A. 2001. “Market Failures and Barriers as a Basis for Clean Energy Policies,” in Energy Policy, 29 (14): 1197-1207.

Year: 2001
Type: Journal Articles
Topic: Energy Policy , Market

Brown, Marilyn A.; Mark D. Levine; Walter Short; Jonathan G. Koomey, 2001. “Scenarios for a Clean Energy Future,” Energy Policy, 2001, 29 (14): 1179-1196.

Year: 2001
Type: Journal Articles
Topic: Clean Energy

Brown, Marilyn A. 2001. “High-Tech Fixes for Carbon Emissions,” in Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 16 (3): 107-110.

Year: 2001
Type: Journal Articles
Topic: Emission

John Sheffield, et al. 2004. “Energy Options for the Future,” Journal of Fusion Energy, 23(2): 63-109.

Year: 2004
Type: Journal Articles
Topic: Energy Option

Brown, Marilyn A.; Benjamin K. Sovacool; Richard F. Hirsh, 2006. “Assessing U.S. Energy Policy,” in Daedalus, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Summer, pp. 5-11.

Year: 2006
Type: Journal Articles
Topic: Energy Policy

Brown, Marilyn A.; Dan York; Martin Kushler, 2007. “Reduced Emissions and Lower Costs: Combining Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency into a Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standard,” The Electricity Journal, 20 (4): 62-72.

Brown, Marilyn A. and Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2007. “Developing an ‘Energy Sustainability Index’ to Evaluate Energy Policy,” Interdisciplinary Science Review, 32 (4): 335-349.

Year: 2007
Type: Journal Articles
Topic: Energy Policy

Brown, Marilyn A. and Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2008. “Promoting a Level Playing Field for Energy Options: Electricity Alternatives and the Case of the Indian Point Energy Center,” Energy Efficiency, 1: 35-48.

Brown, Marilyn A. and Frank Southworth, 2008. “Mitigating Climate Change through Green Buildings and Smart Growth,” Environment and Planning A (40): 653-675.

Brown, Marilyn A. and Sharon (Jess) Chandler, 2008. “Governing Confusion: How Statutes, Fiscal Policy, and Regulations Impede Clean Energy Technologies,” Stanford Law and Policy Review, (19) 3: 472-509.